12
30
05

Choose Your Stench

Like many Canadians, I’ve tuned out the election for a couple of weeks. I haven’t written much about it here over the holidays and though I’ve done some reading, I haven’t followed the stories too closely.

But this can’t be passed up. The Liberal campaign is in absolute shambles. If Paul Martin stood up and announced his favourite book was Hitler’s Mein Kampf, it would scarcely be worse for his fortunes than what’s happened so far.

The Adscam sponsorship scandal has been haunting the electoral battlefields from the very start. It set the context but didn’t define the campaign. The first real blow to the Liberals came from Scott Reid, the Liberal’s director of communications, when he criticized the Conservative child care plan to give families $100 a month by saying “Don’t give people 25 bucks a week to blow on beer and popcorn”.

Now simply called “beer and popcorn”, that major misstep was seized on by opposition party leaders and their supporters who savaged the Liberals. The Libs followed that up with another stunning self-inflicted blow by Mike Klander, executive director of the federal Liberal party in Ontario, when he compared Jack Layton’s wife Olivia Chow to a chow-chow dog on his blog. He posted a picture of her next to a picture of the dog titled “Separated at Birth” and captioned “Chow and Chow Chow”.

Klander has since resigned and his blog has been taken down, though it has been mirrored here. Another minor controversy erupted when Liberal Industry Minister David Emerson said Layton had a “boiled dog’s head smile”, an insult that sounds odd because it is Chinese (he learned it from his wife, who hails from Hong Kong). As a minor bit of mudslinging, this blew over quickly, though it hardly contributed to an atmosphere of constructive debate.

This is all old news for you political junkies, but a little context helps for those who’ve been tuned out over the holidays. The real bombshell was Wednesday’s announcement by the RCMP that they have launched a criminal investigation into the federal government because of the possibility of insider trading stemming from the Ministry of Finance.

Canadian bloggers have kept the fire burning under this issue ever since it was first reported. (Click that link if you want to read what started it all.) The RCMP investigation announcement comes after weeks of speculation and increasingly damning evidence that something stinks. Bad.

Finance Minister Ralph Goodale has refused to step down over the allegations and Martin has backed him up. Which is an admirable bit of political stupidity – admirable for his loyalty in backing up Goodale, stupid because I think Canadians want to see heads roll.

The odour coming from the federal Liberals is overpowering and the polls are reflecting it. Canadians are starting to hold their noses. Unfortunately for Canadians uninterested in Prime Minister Harper, those Canadians are turning to the Conservatives, not the NDP. Support for the NDP is flat while the Conservatives are now tied with the Libs in some polls.

Harper’s fortunes are also buoyed by the campaign the Conservatives have been running. I’m not going to let my dislike of the Conservatives stand in the way of pointing out that they’ve been running a competent campaign. First, they started by putting social issues like gay marriage out on the table to counter claims of a hidden agenda. Second, they focused on making policy announcements. Third, they have simply managed to avoid screwing up: no beer and popcorn statements, no trashy blogs, no criminal investigations.

Policies are what Canadians want to hear about in elections. This is an area where the Liberals should be strong, but they are getting creamed. The Liberal national child-care program policy is superior, I think, to the Conservative $100 a month idea, but beer and popcorn ruined that advantage for them. On the other hand, the Liberal handgun-ban policy is just plain stupid, and a Liberal Party staff member I spoke with admitted as much.

“It might appeal to some people”, he said, “but it’s just a stupid policy.” He works for a Liberal MP and he’s already looking for a new job, because he thinks his boss is going to lose.

As for the NDP, so far this election has played out like usual: the Liberals and Conservatives battle it out while Layton says things in the background that I just can’t make out, either because the media has his microphone on low or because he’s just not loud enough.

At this rate, a Conservative minority government isn’t just possible, it’s likely. This could, as Ryan pointed out before, “give them a chance to play nicey nicey with voters and give them a shot at a majority” when the next election rolls around.

Or perhaps, when Canadians realize the Conservatives smell as bad as the Liberals – a grimy industrial, chemical stench, more like slag pits than the rank cheesy whiffs coming off the decaying corpse of the Liberal Party – they’ll finally give the NDP a chance.

8 Responses to “Choose Your Stench”
  1. Tim:

    The Liberals seriously need a time out. If they keep winning elections, they’ve got no reason to reform, and every reason to continue being unbelievably arrogant. Despite my intense dislike of Harper, I’m hoping for a Conservative win simply on the grounds that change, for better or worse, is absolutely needed. Sure, I’d rather Layton than Harper, but in this election that just isn’t going to happen.

  2. Ade:

    I think what I read a few weeks ago on another blog sums up what you’re saying best. I no longer know where I read this so I will paraphrase:

    “Voting in the Conservatives to punish the Liberals for corruption is like putting a 20% tariff on American fruits and vegetables to punish the US for the softwood lumber dispute. It might hurt them, but we’re still the ones that will have to pay.”

  3. Tim:

    Don’t get me wrong; I’ve no intention to vote Conservative. Canada is bleeding under the Liberals, though, and even if the CPC is not a tourniquet, at least it’s a different kind of hurt.

  4. alevo:

    Imagine, for a moment, how a minority Conservative government might function. The Liberals had their turn at cobbling together minority-status voting coalitions for the passage of money bills and sensitive legislation. Would a Conservative government fair as well? I suspect not. Unless, as mentioned, they play nice – really tone down the volume on contentious social and tax policy. I don’t see the NDP or Liberals being a willing participant in supporting, for instance, a Tory budget (if not for practicality than at least for principle). It is likely that a Harper minority would need the Bloq vote in the House of Commons, but even that is not a long-term strategy for building a strong repore with Canadian voters in Ontario. I don’t really have a point to make. Rather, I am thinking out loud. Any thoughts?

  5. Ade:

    Just read an interesting piece by Richard Gwyn, check it:

    So this is the state of Confederation: A Quebec that has no detectable interest in the rest of the country. An Alberta that has no need to be interested. An Ontario turned inward and self-interested. A British Columbia that has always been detached from the others behind its mountains. And a Newfoundland, highly likely to soon to cease being a have-not province because of off-shore oil and that has historically always been detached.

    I agree that a minority Conservative government will have serious difficulties governing. If they do form a government, which looms as possible if not likely, I think their honeymoon will be brief. A snarled up and fractious government plus their own inevitable scandals – what government avoids scandal? – and Canadians will be back to cynically bashing the feds.

    The article I just linked to above talks about the most important undercurrent of this entire election, national unity. I think we are heading for a crucial time in this country’s history, where Canadians across the nation make up their minds about whether or not we share a destiny. With their emphasis on power being shifted from the federal government to the provinces, a Conservative government may change the landscape of federation considerably.

    Then again, as I write that, I think about what it’s saying – that those in power will work to lessen their power. The lessons of human nature say the opposite is likely. If the Conservatives intend to keep this country together, how will they do it? Can they do it? The province most likely to bail, as always, is Quebec, and their liberal social attitudes conflict with the Conservatives. But the other province to keep an eye on is Alberta. If the Conservatives win, Albertans will be overjoyed.

    Lots to consider, that’s for sure.