06
02
05

Easy Money?

Payday loan businesses seem to be popping up all over the place. These businesses offer cash advances based on your income that must be paid back on your next payday. Their clientele are often low-income earners. When I came across an article about a proposed law in Manitoba that is seeking to regulate interest rates in the province as a “crack down” on these businesses, I thought I’d look into this a little myself.

In Canada, it’s a criminal offence to charge an annual interest rate that is greater than 60 percent. That means that if I were to borrow $1000 for one year, the most anyone could charge me in interest is $600 – things get more complicated if the interest is compounded in periods less than year (like monthly) which is usually the case (and you end up paying more), but I’ll ignore that for now to keep it simple. With that information in mind, I headed downtown to check out two payday loan businesses right across from each other in Gore Park – CashMoney and MoneyMart.

My first stop was CashMoney. Attached to H & R Block in downtown Hamilton, CashMoney has a small location with just one cashier. There were no customers when I arrived, so I was able to stroll up to the front counter – protected by a thick bullet-proof pane of glass – and speak with the cashier immediately.

I asked her a few questions about their service. All you have to do is provide a paystub, a bank record, proof of address and some ID. Then you tell them the amount of the advance you’d like and they calculate how much you need to pay back on your following payday. After writing them a post-dated check dated to your next paycheck for the amount you need to pay back, you get your advance. It’s that simple.

I asked her how much I would end up paying in “interest”. Well, she didn’t call it interest and she didn’t call it service charges either. She said, “You pay $22 on every $100 you get advanced.” I asked her again just to clarify – yup, it’s $22 for every $100.

Assuming a standard scenario where you get paid every two weeks, we can work out the annual interest rate easily. Twenty-two dollars per every $100 is 22 percent over two weeks. There are 52 weeks in a year, which works out to 26 two-week periods. Twenty-two percent multiplied by 26 is 572 percent!

CashMoney
Offering a 50% advance on your paycheck…

I grabbed a couple of pamphlets, including one on responsible borrowing, and headed across the street to MoneyMart. There were three cashiers on duty and a lineup. I took a couple more pamphlets and read them while I waited.

The fees for advances were clearly outlined on the pamphlets. To get a fast cash advance, you pay interest at an annual rate of 59 percent (note they come in just under the 60 percent law), which as the pamphlet describes works out to 89 cents per week per $100. Pretty cheap compared to CashMoney, I thought.

But wait – there’s more. As well as the interest, you pay what MoneyMart calls “1st party check cashing fees”. Those fees? $7.99 per check, plus 9.99% of the face value of the check.

So what does that work out to? MoneyMart lets you borrow from $100 to not more than 30 percent of your net pay, up to a maximum amount of $1500. Let’s say you make $1200 net every two weeks. That means they’ll front you 30 percent, which is $360. So if we look at service charges like interest rates, what’s the total interest rate you’ll pay?

It’s a bit more complicated than CashMoney, but here goes. You pay $6.41 in regular interest, calculated at 59 percent over the year. You also pay a flat rate of $7.99 and 9.99 percent of the $360, which works out to $35.96, for a total payment of $50.36. This works out to an annual interest rate of about 260 percent!

I asked the cashier at MoneyMart what would happen if the post-dated check I wrote to cover my advance bounced. “It’s a $35 NSF charge”, she said, “in addition to the NSF charge your bank will charge you. You don’t want to do that!” No, I don’t, and I don’t imagine anyone does. But what about the people who do? Can they afford that tacked on to an already expensive loan?

MoneyMart
The cheapest payday loans around aren’t that cheap…

This is what is bothering anti-poverty groups. Harold Dyck, from the Social Planning Council of Winnepeg, as quoted in the article I linked to above:

“It does particularly victimize people in the most desperate of circumstances. The general term they use to describe it is the alternative consumer credit market. It’s a bit of a fancy title for a way of essentially soaking people in poverty and just aggravating their condition.”

Of course, the pamphlets and the advertising for these businesses clearly state that this is for short-term loans only, and in order to belong to the Canadian Association of Community Financial Service Providers, you have to prohibit “roll-overs” – the practice of extending loans or of allowing people to take out a new loan to cover their old one. These conditions sound a bit like the “for tobacco use only” stickers on the bongs at the local hemp shop. Are they taken seriously? And is there anything stopping someone from covering an advance from CashMoney with an advance from MoneyMart?

I called CashMoney to find out, and to see what they had to say about an interest rate for their loans that I calculated at 572 percent annually, far in excess of the legal limit. “Is there anything in place to stop someone from covering a cash advance from CashMoney with a cash advance from somewhere else, like MoneyMart?” I asked. “No,” Heidi explained, “it’s two different companies. There’d be no way we could know that”.

I confirmed with her that CashMoney charges $22 on every $100 advanced, and then explained that I had worked that out to an annual rate of 572 percent. “It’s not interest,” she said, “it’s just a fee.” But isn’t that fee essentially interest under a different name? She was adamant – “it’s not interest. It’s a fee.”

14 Responses to “Easy Money?”
  1. wemi:

    Wow, i knew it was a scam but i had no idea it was that bad!

  2. luc:

    i am pretty sure what used to be considered loan sharking is now totally legit. look at some of the tactics used by credit card companies

  3. alevo:

    Let’s open our own cashmoneymart and cash in.

    Trendy big box stores are offering up a huge array of fetish commodities for sale to the lowest income urban shoppers. What’s wrong with a financial service to facilitate their purchases. It’s devious. The real kicker is that the company knows this is not a financial service. It’s not per se, aimed an increasing the wealth of the client, and in return reaping the mutual benefit of their increased demand for financial services. No, these are closed deals aimed at return profit.

    But hey, how else could a welfare family of four buy a knock-off flatscreen TV at Walmart while still having enough money for everybody’s smokes?

    Put that slogan in their next brochure and call a spade a spade. The parent company to MoneyMart, Dollar Financial Corp. calls these loans “financial products.” Products? Right to buy…more…products?


  4. Adrian, its been a little while since my last math class, but I think there is a glaring error in your example.

    If we are following the simple situation you have described, whereby $22 in interest is paid on every $100 borrowed, and $100 is borrowed exactly every two weeks this is how the scenario would actually work out (I think):

    Total yearly earnings = $100/2 weeks x 26 biweekly segments = $2600

    IF each of those $100 biweekly paycheques is cashed in advance, then the interest will be: $22 x 26 biweekly segments = $572

    So, at the year’s end, the interest rate is still 22% (ie $572/$2600 x 100). Or, you could describe it as this: 122% of the total earnings were paid to cashmoney/moneymart.

    Either way, they make more than the credit card companies, because at least the credit card companies give you something of a grace period (well, only if you’re someone who makes their minumum payments every month).

    Hey, if you want to get your money’s worth from these fast cash places I suggest doing this: go to them whenever you want to get your bills changed. They are just like a bank in that sense, so I go there all the time to get rolls of quarters or loonies for my laundry. And I don’t pay a red cent for it!

  5. Ade:

    I’ve been dreading someone questioning my math ever since I wrote this post since I am not exactly a math expert and it’s entirely possible I made mistakes in my calculations, but I think my math holds up on this one. I’ll do a $100 scenario to illustrate:

    I borrow $100 at 22% over two weeks (i.e. I owe $122 after two weeks). How much will I owe over four weeks? Well, if the interest isn’t compounded, I’ll owe $144 after four weeks. If the interest is compounded biweekly as well, I’ll owe $148.84. After six weeks non-compounded I will owe $166. Extrapolating out to a year:

    26 bi-weekly periods each of which costs me $22 on the $100 means after a year I would owe $672 for a non-compounded interest rate of 572%.

    What you’re outlining is not actually a $2600 loan over one year. It’s actually only a $100 loan over one year, because throughout and at the end of the year you are only $100 in debt, not $2600 in debt. In other words you paid $572 in interest over one year but at no point in your scenario were you ever borrowing more than $100 (i.e. you never had more than $100 of borrowed money to do stuff with).


  6. Clarification makes it that much better. I assumed that when you said “$22 on every $100 borrowed” that it was a flat one-time rate. Now that you explain your calculation more, I see how you are coming to your conclusion.

    BUT, your conclusion still doens’t work. The moneymart/cashmoney would only loan the money IF the customer gave them a post-dated cheque that conincides with their next payment date. So, theoretically, if the cheques don’t bounce, the person would have paid the money back at the end of the two week period (ie that $100 would not be owed over the course of a full year). Of course, this gets more complex if they only pay the $100 back and not the remaining $22, and if this remaining $22 adds up each biweekly segment.

    Bottom line: We were both correct from our point of view. I read the problem one way, and you were looking at it differently. Math problems can be like that, they are tricky to write unless you get the wording exactly correct.

  7. Ade:

    Ha ha, all this math is a pain. Anyway, I worked out this math to determine an annual interest rate. The government says you can’t charge more than 60% annually. Instead of taking 60% annually and trying to see what that means biweekly, I took their biweekly “interest rate” and expanded it to an annual interest rate. Whether or not you pay it back on time doesn’t matter for this calculation.

    Going backwards, the government says you can charge 60% annually. 60% divided by 26 (2 week periods) = 2.31%. So the legal amount of INTEREST that is chargeable over 2 weeks is 2.31%. They charge $22 on $100 which is 22% over 2 weeks, almost 10 times the legal amount (just as 572% annually is almost 10 times the legal amount over 1 year).

    They get around this by not calling it interest. It’s that simple. If the interest rate they were charging was 22% annually, they would not have to dodge the term “interest”, and in fact, their interest rates would be comparable to those of credit cards. But they’re actually much higher.

    Dang it, get Niall the math and science genius in here to weigh in. ;)

  8. Ade:

    Check out the figures in this transcript:

    http://www.canada.com/search/story.html?id=22fe3527-d540-4b6e-9c06-62c1fc9a56cd

    Q: Sandra, let’s start by talking about what payday loans are, and how they work.

    A: These are short-term loans, which cost a lot of money to obtain. The idea is to help you bridge the gap between paycheques. Amounts usually range from $100 to $500. It can cost $15 to $25 per $100 to borrow — even if borrowing term is just a week. Sounds innocuous, but say you borrowed $200 for seven days, at a cost of $50. That translates into an annual percentage rate, or APR, of more than 1,300%. 1000% interest is fairly common.

    Canadian law specifies that interest rates cannot be more than 60% per annum, and that is obviously above 60%. Payday loan firms have been criticized because people who use them often poor or desperate, and certainly should not be encouraged to borrow at such high rates of interest

    Q: But how do these firms get around the 60% maximum annual interest law?

    A: Many fudge by tacking on “brokerage” or “processing” fees. “

  9. >:

    I dont think it’s so bad if you dont abuse it There’s no way my bank will give me a quick $200 if something goes wrong. In that sense I think its totally convenient