06
13
05

Where’s the Leadership in Canadian Politics?

Most Canadians have a strange relationship with their politicians, one that is characterized by indifference and a feeling of contempt that rages in degree from mild to severe. Our politicians are a small, detached and clueless clique who constantly struggle for superiority amongst themselves, all the while missing the increasingly obvious cues from a frustrated populace who just want to see some vision and leadership.

Informed by intellectual elites, acting on the results of polls, and communicating via spin doctor, our politicians fiddle while Canada slowly smolders. How has such a vibrant country managed to produce such a mediocre lot of selfish, squabbling children? Is Canada so unimportant to our best and brightest that public service does not beckon them?

Let me make a couple of assumptions: first, that it is possible for an individual to have a vision for the country that appeals to most Canadians, and second, that these individuals do exist and are seeking to hold public office.

These are optimistic assumptions but I think I can defend them. If the first assumption isn’t true, then this country is in deep trouble. Our two main parties have increasingly (and dangerously, for Canadian unity) become representatives of their home bases – the Liberals draw on support from Ontario and (formerly, after the Gomery inquiry) Quebec and the Conservatives draw on their support in the West. But there are common threads that link all Canadians, and I refuse to believe there is no one out there who does not have a vision woven out of all (or most) of these threads.

My second assumption, that individuals with this vision do exist and are seeking public office, I base simply on my own passionate political beliefs and those of others. Each day I read or listen to what Canadians have to say, and it’s clear to me that there is no shortage of passionately articulated and thought-out beliefs about our country. So there must be those who have formulated these beliefs into a broad and consistent vision in our political parties.

If these two assumptions are true, then I’m led to only one conclusion, which is that those individuals in our political parties who have the vision for this country and the leadership qualities Canadians need are not being promoted to positions of prominence in our political parties.

That all of our “leaders” seem to be white men between middle-aged and elderly bears out this conclusion.

Instead of seeking and promoting to leadership positions those who are best for Canada, our parties run on the grease of influence, favours, and backroom deals. Witness the long conspiring of Paul Martin to the throne, the power brokering to merge the Progressive Conservative and Reform parties, the unseemly bagging of Belinda and her instant promotion to cabinet.

How many Canadian leaders and visionaries who are so badly needed in service to their country are passed over each time this happens? How many times does this need to happen to someone before they get frustrated and enter private life instead?

Until we see democratic reform in our political parties, we’re not going to see political reform in our democracy.

7 Responses to “Where’s the Leadership in Canadian Politics?”
  1. Ade:

    In case some of you were wondering if I had disabled comments on this post, no, I didn’t. There was an error with commenting because of the way WordPress formed the link to this post. I fixed it.


  2. Maybe we can gain some insight if we look at the backgrounds of people who primarily enter into federal politics – they are all big businessmen/women. I don’t know a lot about our political history, but if we look at the present, we see that Paul Martin owns some kind of huge shipping business, while Belinda Stronach was CEO of a large auto parts manufacturer (or something along those lines). What about Stephen Harper and Jack Layton? (I don’t know much about them).

    These people initially may have initially had no intentions of going into politics. They are business people, and many have come by their business through family connections. Its not something that they’ve necessarily worked all their lives for…it was moreso handed to them. Of course, this is a very generalized statement and I’m sure there are exceptions.

    Could it be that these people were motivated to go into politics for power? Maybe they were motivated to affect political change in such a way that it promotes or improves their business, or even protects it. This may well be one reason why we see only middle-aged white men in politics…the majority of wealthy independent business owners fall into this category.

    As for the average guy, say someone like Adrian, who is passionate about Canadian politics, why can’t he get into public service? Well, he could, and he would have to start at the bottom and work his way up. This may take some time, since he’s relatively unknown in the business and political world, and will have to work hard for many years with little pay in order to make the connections he needs to support his campaigns. Compare that to an affluent businessman, who has been chumming around with big money makers all his life. Once he decides to make his foray into politics, he will have a relatively easy time getting the funds he needs for his campaign, especially compared to Adrian. He already knows many important people both in the business and political world.

    I would argue that there are passionate individuals involved in public service, people who actually care about the future and welfare of Canadians. However, these are not people of great financial influence, and therefore they have a difficult time attaining a position of significant political power. While a party leader must have vision, he or she must also have power. So, the good ol’boys club that’s controlling the money is also running the show.

    Adrian, you seem very passionate about Canadian politics, so tell me this – what is preventing you from becoming involved?

  3. Ade:

    Getting into politics is something that I have thought about for a long time, and these days I think about it probably more than ever before. Whether or not my involvement in politics ought to be as a politician, pundit, activist or journalist is something I haven’t figured out yet.

    In terms of my main obstacles to political involvement right now, they would be 1. Lack of money and 2. Lack of knowledge and experience.

    Re. 1, as you pointed out it takes at the minimum financial independence to make the leap to a job that doesn’t pay all that well and that you can lose either at any time, or once every four years or so.

    Re. 2, which is more important – I lack enough knowledge and experience. I don’t think my ideas are developed enough, I lack a broad knowledge of all areas of this country and of many different Canadians. Even if I were to get started “small” and run for, say, city councillor, I’d be up against people who have money, connections and are well-known in the community…having a blog hardly qualifies me for political office. It does help me develop a voice and it also means I’m often talking about Canada with Canadians so it definitely helps. I also think travelling in Canada would be great for this but without 1 taken care of, that’s not easy.

    But I’m slowly working towards overcoming these obstacles so who can say what the future might bring. An evolution from criticism (easy) to suggesting solutions (harder) to implementing solutions (hardest) is necessary, I think.

  4. wemi:

    Have you thought about volunteering?

  5. wemi:

    So have you??

  6. Ade:

    Yes.

  7. S Legault:

    I have been thinking latley about politics, our country needs a new party something like “the regular Joe party” a party that wont cave to big business and work for the people not the top 5% of money makers. Lets do it!!!!